>"Concerned" Trolling about the Accessibility of the Wayland session.
Okay, first off, what's up with the random capitalisation? This doesn't just happen on this line, what's wrong with their brain?

Moving on. I have no idea what the "concerned" trolling is but it seems wrong to dismiss accessibility concerns as trolling simply because one does not understand accessibility needs. They are complex and frankly within the linux sphere requests for features or talking about the way something works is met with friction, when the user can often be presenting it from an accessibility standpoint. It's a valid approach and dismissing concerned because you have a "culture war" going on within your movement is not acceptable.

Additionally, there's problems when you're doing this while also trying to take a stab at virtue signalling. You can be upset with fascists, nazis, you can hate conspiracy theories and even that people don't like gays or are using primary school insults.
However to do so, you must separate the things you are upset about from legitimate accessibility concerns. People with accessibility issues exist and please do not attempt to use us in a shield from criticism. Additionally, do not use us as a shield in such a poor manner. Listen to us, if we have concerns, consider them, explain in a clear manner if something is not possible or suggest alternatives but don't try to use us as a grenade in your war, while failing to virtue signal.

You're closer to vice than you think: you utter fucking clown.