Search Results
6/10/2025, 10:58:09 AM
>>40503837
Sure gas molecules get their kinetic energy from heat but energy rate isn’t proportional to altitude. For example, the thermosphere is said to be more than 60x hotter than at the average ground temperature, meaning that gas molecules at higher altitudes would have even MORE kinetic energy to overcome gravity’s alleged entropic effect on them. This is an absolute death shot to the assertion that gravity can act as a container bc the strength of gravity falls off at the inverse square, while the available kinetic energy of gas molecules is increased drastically at higher altitudes due to increased temperatures.
Also, based on what you’ve written in your post, it seems like you don’t really even understand the premise of the Parabox to begin with. Try actually reading the posts linked itp you’re replying to. It’s best first to make sure you’re comprehending what’s being discussed prior to attempting to refute it.
Sure gas molecules get their kinetic energy from heat but energy rate isn’t proportional to altitude. For example, the thermosphere is said to be more than 60x hotter than at the average ground temperature, meaning that gas molecules at higher altitudes would have even MORE kinetic energy to overcome gravity’s alleged entropic effect on them. This is an absolute death shot to the assertion that gravity can act as a container bc the strength of gravity falls off at the inverse square, while the available kinetic energy of gas molecules is increased drastically at higher altitudes due to increased temperatures.
Also, based on what you’ve written in your post, it seems like you don’t really even understand the premise of the Parabox to begin with. Try actually reading the posts linked itp you’re replying to. It’s best first to make sure you’re comprehending what’s being discussed prior to attempting to refute it.
Page 1