Search Results
6/20/2025, 3:16:43 PM
>>40560181
>Because that would be the only explanation.
It wouldn't be.
I can think of several immediately. Conflicts of interests, dislike of certain parties and willingness to sacrifice other for one's goals, lack of regard for regular, "lesser" people, considering them assets and resources to spend, selfishness, megalomania or merely cold, calculating advantage-oriented thinking.
I probably could think of a few others. You're just a dumbass lacking imagination and brains if you cannot do the same.
Funnily enough, you know what's the biggest reasons?
>Why don't they spend it on things that actually help people?
It's often the attempt of them to do so on a scale too big to handle. Rather than fostering a good change in their closest environment, they seek a global change, often theough clashing means and aforementioned sacrifices for the "good cause". To make their utopias they're willing to sacrifice rights, freedoms and individuals - some because they make their control weaker, some because the individuals are disruptive and not behaving gow they like and beinf ideological enemies of theirs.
But no person can make such sweeping changes even if their idea would be universally supported and good - because you cannot micromanage it all, yet going through intermediaries will corrupt the idea and dilute the resources especially since people under you may have the ideas to go about enacting your will differing from what you intend, or simply finding it proper to twist it a bit to serve their own good as well (whether they believe it fair or are greedy for similar power). And many as noble-minded individuals who want to go about it in different ways will be a danger to each other competitors to be fought, using one's assets.
1/2
>Because that would be the only explanation.
It wouldn't be.
I can think of several immediately. Conflicts of interests, dislike of certain parties and willingness to sacrifice other for one's goals, lack of regard for regular, "lesser" people, considering them assets and resources to spend, selfishness, megalomania or merely cold, calculating advantage-oriented thinking.
I probably could think of a few others. You're just a dumbass lacking imagination and brains if you cannot do the same.
Funnily enough, you know what's the biggest reasons?
>Why don't they spend it on things that actually help people?
It's often the attempt of them to do so on a scale too big to handle. Rather than fostering a good change in their closest environment, they seek a global change, often theough clashing means and aforementioned sacrifices for the "good cause". To make their utopias they're willing to sacrifice rights, freedoms and individuals - some because they make their control weaker, some because the individuals are disruptive and not behaving gow they like and beinf ideological enemies of theirs.
But no person can make such sweeping changes even if their idea would be universally supported and good - because you cannot micromanage it all, yet going through intermediaries will corrupt the idea and dilute the resources especially since people under you may have the ideas to go about enacting your will differing from what you intend, or simply finding it proper to twist it a bit to serve their own good as well (whether they believe it fair or are greedy for similar power). And many as noble-minded individuals who want to go about it in different ways will be a danger to each other competitors to be fought, using one's assets.
1/2
Page 1