>>149336920
>But it isn't real, there are no victims
that isn't the argument being made by that anon. He's saying it's tasteless, which, objectively, it is. It's like drawing scat porn. Sure, nobody's actually eating shit or catching diseases from doing so, but it's still disgusting to jack off to it, and if you do, you are clearly mentally unwell. Whether that's worth "trying to kill a person's online presence" isn't what's being discussed here, just that it is undeniably "unpalatable".