>>510862123
Is that a reflection of the second person being more valuable than you in an objective sense, or merely contextually more valuable to the first person? The former informs the latter to some degree, but they're not one-to-one. Ultimately your responsibility is to determine what (You) value and seek to embody that to the greatest degree possible; for some people this will increase your value to them, for others it will diminish it, and for still others it might have no effect on their valuation of you. If you think their low valuation of you is reflective of something you should improve, then do so, but don't uncritically assume that it's merited

>>508296332
Even if this were possible, you'd run into the same problem with other ethnic groups ad infinitum, and they'd eventually just gang up on you once it became clear that your ultimate aim was to kill them all. If, however, everyone were to be straightforward about wanting to protect their ethnic interests upfront, while resisting the temptation of supremacist chauvinism by acknowledging the validity of others' ethnic interests alongside their own, a stable equilibrium could be reached. The ULTIMATE solution would be to use eugenics to produce a universal superhuman ethnos which everyone assimilates into (which, let's be real, would probably be something like hapa elves with violet eyes), but to get to that point we still have to pass the checkpoints of a) the techno-aristocracy beginning to employ eugenics and gene editing en masse and then b) the democratization of that technology following the UBI NEET vs Skynet wars

So in the upcoming race war where do Italians and Greeks fit in?
Who's killin me?
Cause I know the whites ain't gonna help me
Maybe the Jews will help fellow Meds out