>>21456038
This. I like that at least on /ck/ there are smart and wordy posts which don't get accused of being 'bots' or 'A.I.'
They've had the same "studies" being published since I can remember in the 80s. Most people just ignore it or read between the lines and look for something true in there. But now so many online are distrustful and insane with paranoia so there's a different reaction to all of this. It's all some big "conspiracy".
Just harmless clickbait, no different from supermarket checkout magazine covers from 30-40 years ago.