>>64063393
>>64063365
>Those 2 lb Zev/Overwatch triggers freak me out from a safety standpoint 3bh, so I try to stay away from those.
i recently got the OW polydat, improved safety plunger, and their improved (non-OEM) minus connector, all NP3 coated. fwiw, the trigger by itself is no lighter than a standard glock trigger (maybe imperceptibly so thanks to the NP3 coating). it does remove some of the pre-travel though (however, not enough to defeat the safeties).

i would say it's probably the "best" trigger setup i've tried so far (that doesn't totally compromise safety or reliability). the polydat trigger shoe is nice. the minus connector does what it says on the tin (lowers the trigger pull while retaining a distinct wall unlike OEM minus connectors), but it did also introduce some slide drag which i haven't got around to fixing. the np3 coating is kind of a meme, i don't notice a huge difference between it and a worn-in glock/25c trigger job.

overall, does it make a practical difference that justifies the price and reduced confidence from using non-OEM? eh...

(btw i've used a zev kit before and it was an enormous piece of shit)

>>64063397
>99.9% of people who own Glocks will never be able to outshoot their machine.
very true. better irons are maybe the one mandatory upgrade (but durability aside, i think blacking out the stock rears with a sharpie is sufficient for 99% of people). i like swapping in an OEM smooth-faced trigger too