>>717138670
gabe's been fooled by the scammers and jeets, unfortunately.
anyone that knows what they're talking about knows that AI is snake oil for coding.
>it cant correct itself (even with help), cant even see critical errors that prevent the script from running
>it makes code thats WAY too complex for humans to feasibly work with (meaning you cant build on top of what the AI made). note: this does not mean that the code is even remotely good
>it wont design secure systems (ex: the tea app was "vibe coded" (made with AI))
>the way it interprets things is too erratic and unreliable. if you say "make a system to use consumable items" in several instances of the same AI you'll get a wildly different output every time, and there wont be any reasoning for the differences
>has severe problems with long term memory, even if it has full access to your entire code base it'll constantly forget that things exist
>doesnt care about the actual user interface, it wont try to organize it for a better end user experience. the end result could be unusable outright
>same goes for gameplay, the AI doesnt have a metric for "good", "high quality", or even "tolerable". chances are if you use an AI to help you make a game everything it generates will be atrocious to actually play through or interact with
>wont optimize. if you try to make a pixel game chances are that it'll run like an over-bloated UE5 game
thats just off the top of my head
at its core, all this AI crap comes from prediction algorithms that have been trained off the entire internet (which we have had FOREVER, fuck we even had chatbots more than a decade before this AI crap)
doesnt matter how far the shills take modern AI, its biggest problems will never be solved because the flaws exist within the foundation itself
and as the cherry on top, it being a prediction algorithm means that it'll always give you the mediocre solution.

>>531672590
I rather enjoy the game than stream view count, but you do you