Search Results
7/21/2025, 8:06:04 PM
>>937407408
>isn't going to change much if they enter the work force 5-10 years later. I'd argue it might be better that they enter the work force at 30-35 and work continuously versus entering at 20-25 and dropping out for 5 to 10 years when they have a baby.
but history shows us that doesn't usually happen. the change in times wasn't married housewifes attending college and becoming dual income earners...it was promoting safe sex/college to young girls who delay marriage/kids for careers.
>isn't going to change much if they enter the work force 5-10 years later. I'd argue it might be better that they enter the work force at 30-35 and work continuously versus entering at 20-25 and dropping out for 5 to 10 years when they have a baby.
but history shows us that doesn't usually happen. the change in times wasn't married housewifes attending college and becoming dual income earners...it was promoting safe sex/college to young girls who delay marriage/kids for careers.
Page 1