>>938208566
>the fantasy aspect is more attractive than actually doing it
Anon, don't you get that this applies to literal pedos as well? You're not creating a case that could differentiate between them and lolicons.
>which is correlation between acts in media and acts in real life.
Literally no one has said a single thing about "acts", if anything you've been told several times that most pedos don't act on kids either, what we are talking about here is about the nature of the attraction and how these fictional objects are unequivocally related to real concepts, even if they aren't literally the same as them

This is gay porn.