Search Results
6/25/2025, 11:16:31 PM
>>2826198
Yeah I didn't like their regional groupings either, but it's one of the more comprehensive studies I've seen on the subject of mature forest blocks and total area in the US. They also included a different set of regions like pic rel which conforms to more traditional regions (like the south, and core SW US). Also keep in mind mature forest is not the same as old growth on these maps, most of the area is just mature stands (~70-150 years old for deciduous, ~100-250 years old for conifer).
Yeah I didn't like their regional groupings either, but it's one of the more comprehensive studies I've seen on the subject of mature forest blocks and total area in the US. They also included a different set of regions like pic rel which conforms to more traditional regions (like the south, and core SW US). Also keep in mind mature forest is not the same as old growth on these maps, most of the area is just mature stands (~70-150 years old for deciduous, ~100-250 years old for conifer).
Page 1