>>716060847
>Sell a Game
You are not selling a game, you are selling a perpetual license that enables me to make use of a good. A transferable, resellable license, protected by and guaranteed by EU law to be such.
>Tell the users that the game will end upfront
You did no such thing, you used obfuscating terminology that says that the "service" can end, but within the context of this contract, this means nothing in particular, since goods and services are separate things and your service agreement in regards to software and its operation, by statement of its cessation does not necessarily mean cessation of function of the good.
>Users agree to the terms
Me pressing "I agree" to start the game doesn't actually mean that I do agree to those contractual terms, since they are are represented in an unfair pre-negotiated contract that tries to pass off selling of goods for selling of services, which is fraudulent. In these three lines alone you have already committed enough fraud to ensure your imprisonment if you were to have been prosecuted.

>>713474531
He was an unfathomably based man. We don't get political leaders like that anymore.