>>509101921
What the other anon means is for something to be really free (as in no charge) someone has to produce it in exchange for nothing. This is why anything that requires labor cannot be “a right”, it is a service. No free services exist without slave labor. Is it clear enough for you now? Should I express it in a less white tone? Maybe a brownfield response would be more appropriate?

Only the mediocre prefer the collective to the individual. That’s why all those ideologies are so popular and always will be. That’s why there’s a push to eradicate excellence.