>>8624393
bwo i've been training on 1536, found that finer details and textures are replicated better (empirical) with less artifacts, would need lesser face crops to get better looking eyes for example.
also noted that it led to the losses converging in tighter groups & at lower minimas. i have not tested for training on noob, but so far i do find it beneficial when training on base illu0.1.
>>8624403
Like >>8624436 said, it could be placebo, but I do that to reduce the effect of the quality tags on the style.
>[masterpiece, best quality::0.6]
>Out of curiousity, what's this for?
this will apply the quality tags for the first 60% of the steps only.
>Do you think those tags negatively impact finer details?
quality tags tend to be biased towards a certain style and might detract from the style you might be going for. i.e. scratchier lines of a style you are using might become smoother due to quality tags.
0.6 is just an arbitrary value that i selected to 'give the image good enough quality' before letting the other style tags / loras have 'more effect' (honestly the effect is quite minor - see picrel, outlines slightly more emphasized with quality tags)