>>105564366
>i think you are right saying it is a security vulnerability but they don't need batteries is the point of that faggots video.
I didn't watch it, buy an ad.

>>105564379
>Haven't you retards heard of rechargable batteries?
Inefficient compared to just using a wire and plugging it in. Plus you now have a fire hazard especially when you consider how hot computers can get.

>Do you really think people just buy a stacks of alkalines instead of two to four nimh rechargeables?
They literally do.