So what were they smoking? Was it weed?

>>11870947
This was pretty common in the west as a form of women remaining "chaste" and it being the man who forces her to engage in "lustful" and "carnal" activities, mostly as a hold-over from Victorian times. It's all pretty retarded really, but it originates from the anglo cultural system in the West. German women and French women do not have nearly as much of the prim and proper pretense as anglo women tend to.

This all died of course when MeToo happened around a decade ago, and now you're seen as a monster if a girl says "stop" and you continue anyways. Even CNC, which is consensual-non-consensual, the tamest form of "rape-play" (think sexual wrestling, or voluntary bondage), is a gigantic taboo in the west now. It was only 50 years ago, back in the 70's, that you had smut books with men forcibly raping young girls in them, and now if you even so much as hint at sexuality that is not signed on the dotted line you are an unforgivable piece of shit.

Feminism has really done a number on the West. I'll just come out and say it; rape in the context of fantasy or fiction is completely fine. It's not real. There is nothing wrong with it. Who fucking cares? It's far more concerning that beheading people is seen as okay, but sex without 100% certainty and admission of participation is seen as demonstrable.

>>60618950
you wanted someone to post this image, don't you?

>>510036875

>>212504270
*hits pipe*