Search Results
7/13/2025, 10:17:39 AM
>>715337034
This thread is made 2 times a week by frog posters on /sci/ and the only difference is the posts cite more quantiites and numbers like those explain the cause or something.
>>715337112
The gravitational force is provoked by spacetime distortions inherent to all objects with mass.
How convenient, it's just inherent like Jesus's unconditional fucking love isn't it?
>The gravitational force is provoked by spacetime distortions inherent to all objects with mass, although this isnt even wiki level knowledge at this point. You will not be able to wordweasel your way out of the basic observation that gravity can't be electromagnetic in nature because it still works on electromagnetically inert substances.
Which is why I said "dielectric acceleration" which even suits your definitions because that's "accelerating charged particles using electric fields generated within or near dielectric materials". We are living on one big electric field, several in fact, we have the moon sun. Even the planet itself is a halbach array of polarized technonic plates from when the poles switch. Is any of this accounted or do you just cite a number as a gravitational constant and attribute the observation of mutually accelerating objects towards one another as a completely seperate force?
>You cannot magnetize a lump of common plastic
You are conflating magnets with magnetism/electromagnetism. Everything reacts to a magnetic field. Just because it doesn't work or react the same as "colbalt iron and nickle" doesn't mean shit. They use fucking copper and aluminum for power transmission you idiot. The mix of dia/para/ferro magnetic materials in the planet and electromagnetism is undoubtedly your "gravity".
This thread is made 2 times a week by frog posters on /sci/ and the only difference is the posts cite more quantiites and numbers like those explain the cause or something.
>>715337112
The gravitational force is provoked by spacetime distortions inherent to all objects with mass.
How convenient, it's just inherent like Jesus's unconditional fucking love isn't it?
>The gravitational force is provoked by spacetime distortions inherent to all objects with mass, although this isnt even wiki level knowledge at this point. You will not be able to wordweasel your way out of the basic observation that gravity can't be electromagnetic in nature because it still works on electromagnetically inert substances.
Which is why I said "dielectric acceleration" which even suits your definitions because that's "accelerating charged particles using electric fields generated within or near dielectric materials". We are living on one big electric field, several in fact, we have the moon sun. Even the planet itself is a halbach array of polarized technonic plates from when the poles switch. Is any of this accounted or do you just cite a number as a gravitational constant and attribute the observation of mutually accelerating objects towards one another as a completely seperate force?
>You cannot magnetize a lump of common plastic
You are conflating magnets with magnetism/electromagnetism. Everything reacts to a magnetic field. Just because it doesn't work or react the same as "colbalt iron and nickle" doesn't mean shit. They use fucking copper and aluminum for power transmission you idiot. The mix of dia/para/ferro magnetic materials in the planet and electromagnetism is undoubtedly your "gravity".
Page 1