>>18480302
>look at you not addressing any actual points
you have no points.
all you're hoping to do is sew confusion with uneducated readers.
but i'm pretty sure most people know they do biomed research on rats because they have very close anatomic and genetic similarity to humans.

>in rats with different systems to humans
>Rodents have long been the preferred species of lab animals in biomedical research, with sporadic experiments on common brown rats stemming back 150 years. Though laboratory animal research continues to pose ethical questions, particularly with respect to animal welfare, the scientific achievements linked to lab rats are innumerous. This primarily relates to the extraordinary anatomical, genetic, and physiological similarities between humans and rodents.

>continued to outweigh their risks for all approved uses.
we're back to "blindly trust big pharma goy"
the risks are your dick shrinking, suicidal thoughts, loss of all sexual function permanently.
let people make their own choice if that's worth it shill.