Search Results
6/13/2025, 2:35:44 AM
>>527220246
>both games use [ATB]
No they don't. They're action games that have a "Super" meter a la fighting games. Just because this feature is referred to as "ATB" (to tingle your memberberries) does not mean that it functions in the more traditional sense of the turn-based/ATB games. XIV is more of an ATB game than either Remake or Rebirth are, and I would not call XIV an ATB game.
>And you said act III was weak, which is a low IQ opinion.
Act III in incredibly weak and the reveal of Act III is something you learn never to do even in elementary school writing classes. It's not good when other games do it, it's not good when other pieces of media do it, and it's not good when E33 did it. It's incredibly disappointing.
What I find strange is how E33 has managed to garner one of the most pseudo-intellectual fanbases I've ever seen, despite how explicitly laid out everything in its narrative is. It's a very strange phenomenon. Normally the pseudo-intellectual types flock to games with nebulous stories or purposely obtuse and barely explained plot devices. E33 has none of that; everything is cut and dry and there are no questions about anything except for what occurs in the "real world" outside of the Painting, but this is literally never the subject of any discussion other than my own. Yet for some reason, the paid shills really instilled in the mindless drones that the commonly held opinion that Act III is weak is something that is indicative of "low IQ", rather than the more obvious and logical conclusion - that it is a cop out, is never good, is known as a bad trope for a reason, and indicates someone who has experience with "media" outside of video games (even though video games have done this same thing as well)
>both games use [ATB]
No they don't. They're action games that have a "Super" meter a la fighting games. Just because this feature is referred to as "ATB" (to tingle your memberberries) does not mean that it functions in the more traditional sense of the turn-based/ATB games. XIV is more of an ATB game than either Remake or Rebirth are, and I would not call XIV an ATB game.
>And you said act III was weak, which is a low IQ opinion.
Act III in incredibly weak and the reveal of Act III is something you learn never to do even in elementary school writing classes. It's not good when other games do it, it's not good when other pieces of media do it, and it's not good when E33 did it. It's incredibly disappointing.
What I find strange is how E33 has managed to garner one of the most pseudo-intellectual fanbases I've ever seen, despite how explicitly laid out everything in its narrative is. It's a very strange phenomenon. Normally the pseudo-intellectual types flock to games with nebulous stories or purposely obtuse and barely explained plot devices. E33 has none of that; everything is cut and dry and there are no questions about anything except for what occurs in the "real world" outside of the Painting, but this is literally never the subject of any discussion other than my own. Yet for some reason, the paid shills really instilled in the mindless drones that the commonly held opinion that Act III is weak is something that is indicative of "low IQ", rather than the more obvious and logical conclusion - that it is a cop out, is never good, is known as a bad trope for a reason, and indicates someone who has experience with "media" outside of video games (even though video games have done this same thing as well)
Page 1