Search Results
7/12/2025, 11:57:39 AM
>>510165917
>Capitalism is fiat currency or even fictional fiat currency as legal tender.
Finally getting some definitions from you. No capitalism is the free market.
Two farmers, one with a cow, and another with some chickens, trading eggs and chicken for milk and butter freely, and with no coercion or government involvement is free market capitalism.
As soon as the government issues money (even if it is gold or silver) AND legal tender laws to enforce acceptance, the market is no longer completely free. If the government start setting minimum/maximum prices, requires llicensing for producers, the market becomes less and less free.
When the government issues fiat currency and forces people using threat of jail to accept it, the government is basing all commerce on a commodity (fiat) that the government controls the supply of, and manipulates for the benefit of insiders, (who are often, but not always Jewish) to the detriment of the general population.
By this point the system cannot be called free market capitalism, it's a mixed economy with some freedoms, and some government controls. In the USA, the turning point from then the system went from mostly free, with some controls, to a controlled market with an ever decreasing amount was 1913, the year the Federal Reserve was created.
You cannot redefiine things in ways that are favorable to your argument. Free market capitalism should be a redundancy, but epistemological confusion necessitates that I use that formulation.
>Capitalism is fiat currency or even fictional fiat currency as legal tender.
Finally getting some definitions from you. No capitalism is the free market.
Two farmers, one with a cow, and another with some chickens, trading eggs and chicken for milk and butter freely, and with no coercion or government involvement is free market capitalism.
As soon as the government issues money (even if it is gold or silver) AND legal tender laws to enforce acceptance, the market is no longer completely free. If the government start setting minimum/maximum prices, requires llicensing for producers, the market becomes less and less free.
When the government issues fiat currency and forces people using threat of jail to accept it, the government is basing all commerce on a commodity (fiat) that the government controls the supply of, and manipulates for the benefit of insiders, (who are often, but not always Jewish) to the detriment of the general population.
By this point the system cannot be called free market capitalism, it's a mixed economy with some freedoms, and some government controls. In the USA, the turning point from then the system went from mostly free, with some controls, to a controlled market with an ever decreasing amount was 1913, the year the Federal Reserve was created.
You cannot redefiine things in ways that are favorable to your argument. Free market capitalism should be a redundancy, but epistemological confusion necessitates that I use that formulation.
Page 1