>>509648771
There is no such thing as a pure individual,or its very rarely the case,just like there is no such thing as a pure presentation of any disease,illness and ailment. Therefore the percentages that you are talking about only have to be gross estimations. And while its true that within the genus homo sapiens sapiens there is a lot of diversity and no 2 human groups are the same,it is imperative to consider that even if 2 people of vastly different genetic heritage have a child,it is statistically less relevant what either parent brings to the table because the baby will inherit 2 alleles,2 copies of every single gene one from the mother and one from the father and many traits that people in here boast about are polygenetic meaning that theres multiple genes controlling eye colour,skin colour,iq etc. and while this can be simplified with those IXth grade drawings with blue eyes and brown eyes,there is also the case that certain positive or pathological traits such as blood group (A,B,O) can be inherited in a non mendelian way. Its called the bombay phenotype for example. Its more complicated that thinking that IQ and phenotype and genetic proximity change rapidly because of that. And what would this argument even probe in a century of nation states? We arent in 800 AD where people said you have 1% of peasant dna therefore youre not of royal blood. Our societies are diverse and have vastly different ethnic group and racial purity is extremely stupid especially in North america where everyone is mixed

Its more important not to have a dick baby which theres dozens of different diseases