>>510599389
Yes historians will argue about shit all the time, see pic related for an example. Ancient stuff where sources are more scant have a lot of controversey & debate around them

Historians even today debate on certain aspects of the holocaust, certain minor details, but the broad facts are pretty widely accepted because there's literal mountains of evidence for them, and if it was as easy to poke holes in it as /pol/ claims then historians would be shitting on it on the regular

If the holocaust really was as "unquestionable" and as much of a conspiracy as you niggers claim, then historians wouldn't have revised the number of people who were sent to Auschwitz from 4 million to 1 million, and wouldn't say the "turned jews into soap thing" was just atrocity propaganda and not real. If the holocaust is as you say, then these revisions never would have happened but this shit is constantyl analyzed and scrutinized by historians and other academics and academics love to poke holes in things if they can

Hell >>510599524 is a perfect example, if the holocaust was as you say it was then historians wouldn't claim this specific eyewitness account doesn't match up to evidence. Which I know what you nazi niggers will say, but there's hundreds of thousands of eyewitness accounts, one or two might not necessarily be reliable but hundreds of thousands more are, especially when backed with other evidence, of which there is plenty

>>510599408
These "redpills" are pretty much bs, it's literally the same style of argument that flat earthers make, things that can vaguely sound convincing to a normie but if you actually dig into it you'll find it's bullshit. Shit, if you niggers have something specific to show me I can give a perfect example of what I'm talking about. You niggers say 'do your own research" but will uncritically believe random bullshit posted by anonymous strangers on a mongolian basket weaving forum