Search Results
7/19/2025, 2:04:31 AM
>>531793736
>>531793759
>>531793759
>that never happened
You wanna know what that retard had to see about Skadi in the Quick Looping Era?
>In Conclusion:
>Skadi is a huge step in the right direction for Quicks, but she’s not a complete solution. Even with Skadi’s buffs, Quick cards are still the weakest typing, and Skadi’s massive crit buff being limited to Quick cards means bad card draws can really hurt your overall damage. Skadi teams are quite vulnerable to bad luck in general—whether that’s stars that don’t fall where you want them to, or a crit that doesn’t land, or a string of enemy attacks targeting your DPS, or an unfortunate series of card draws. Any of those things can really hurt her ability to keep your team kicking. Although her offensive support is quite good, Skadi is going to have trouble keeping a team alive without help, and Quick’s options in that regard are a fair bit weaker than Buster’s and Arts’s.
>For all those drawbacks, though, Skadi opens up a lot of interesting possibilities. Primeval-Rune-boosted NP spam has the potential to be really scary with the right setup, and against a single target and with someone to protect from cards Skadi can reliably nullify enemy NP turns. Quick teams still lack the stability of Arts teams and the damage of Buster teams, but Skadi does give Quick teams access to a little of both. She’s a godsend (pun intended) to Quick team fans, and I expect her to be quite useful to those who find ways to cover for her flaws.
>Rabbit’s Arbitrary Ratings:
>Overall: 9/10
>Single-Target DPS: 3/10
>AoE DPS: N/A
>Survivability: 5/10
>Offensive Utility: 9/10
>Defensive Utility: 5/10
>Farming Usefulness: 3/10
>Being Scathach: 0/10
What rabbit said was so baffling and stupid, that his "review" ended up becoming a copypasta. Check the archives if you don't believe me
>>531793759
>>531793759
>that never happened
You wanna know what that retard had to see about Skadi in the Quick Looping Era?
>In Conclusion:
>Skadi is a huge step in the right direction for Quicks, but she’s not a complete solution. Even with Skadi’s buffs, Quick cards are still the weakest typing, and Skadi’s massive crit buff being limited to Quick cards means bad card draws can really hurt your overall damage. Skadi teams are quite vulnerable to bad luck in general—whether that’s stars that don’t fall where you want them to, or a crit that doesn’t land, or a string of enemy attacks targeting your DPS, or an unfortunate series of card draws. Any of those things can really hurt her ability to keep your team kicking. Although her offensive support is quite good, Skadi is going to have trouble keeping a team alive without help, and Quick’s options in that regard are a fair bit weaker than Buster’s and Arts’s.
>For all those drawbacks, though, Skadi opens up a lot of interesting possibilities. Primeval-Rune-boosted NP spam has the potential to be really scary with the right setup, and against a single target and with someone to protect from cards Skadi can reliably nullify enemy NP turns. Quick teams still lack the stability of Arts teams and the damage of Buster teams, but Skadi does give Quick teams access to a little of both. She’s a godsend (pun intended) to Quick team fans, and I expect her to be quite useful to those who find ways to cover for her flaws.
>Rabbit’s Arbitrary Ratings:
>Overall: 9/10
>Single-Target DPS: 3/10
>AoE DPS: N/A
>Survivability: 5/10
>Offensive Utility: 9/10
>Defensive Utility: 5/10
>Farming Usefulness: 3/10
>Being Scathach: 0/10
What rabbit said was so baffling and stupid, that his "review" ended up becoming a copypasta. Check the archives if you don't believe me
7/19/2025, 12:07:53 AM
7/5/2025, 10:56:42 AM
>>530019434
>>530018189
>>530019702
>>530020360
what an absolutely embarrassing display of human behavior
I'm sorry your life is in such a bad state, bro..
>>530018189
>>530019702
>>530020360
what an absolutely embarrassing display of human behavior
I'm sorry your life is in such a bad state, bro..
6/20/2025, 3:33:46 PM
Page 1