Search Results
6/20/2025, 10:49:38 PM
>>23334396
That's what I've been getting at as well as the other posters, lmao
Trust me I'd rather people tear into the show if it was an honest hate that had substance. This is clearly the result of (for lack of a better term) brainrotted shitposters who consume the lowest forms of review commentary and don't actively form opinions.
>>23334397
To you I point to this anon's post >>23334393
it's one thing to hold an opinion and another to be a bad faith actor. I respect your willingness to bat for people who dislike a show and normally I agree that dismissing someone's view as insincere is both rude and unhelpful, but in this case it is warranted.
>>23334410
Did you ever watch Gred Glintstone's video on Elden Ring criticism? A completely unrelated tangent, I know, but it succinctly addresses your question. Much like how Joseph Anderson saw Matthewmatosis' video on DSII and aped it for legitimate industry critique, people see RLM's reviews and instead of taking them as the internet equivalent of humorous watercooler discussion they've assumed it is an actual valid style of criticism and is infallible. It pollutes discussion.
That's what I've been getting at as well as the other posters, lmao
Trust me I'd rather people tear into the show if it was an honest hate that had substance. This is clearly the result of (for lack of a better term) brainrotted shitposters who consume the lowest forms of review commentary and don't actively form opinions.
>>23334397
To you I point to this anon's post >>23334393
it's one thing to hold an opinion and another to be a bad faith actor. I respect your willingness to bat for people who dislike a show and normally I agree that dismissing someone's view as insincere is both rude and unhelpful, but in this case it is warranted.
>>23334410
Did you ever watch Gred Glintstone's video on Elden Ring criticism? A completely unrelated tangent, I know, but it succinctly addresses your question. Much like how Joseph Anderson saw Matthewmatosis' video on DSII and aped it for legitimate industry critique, people see RLM's reviews and instead of taking them as the internet equivalent of humorous watercooler discussion they've assumed it is an actual valid style of criticism and is infallible. It pollutes discussion.
Page 1