Search Results
6/19/2025, 10:09:46 PM
>>101327172
based libertarian spotted
>>101330187
it's not moral relativism destroying the west, it's progressivism which is a strict concrete ideology with its own stated rigid worldview and prescriptive morals. Moral relativism is just the belief/observation that there is no proven objective morality and that competing different moral systems exist that are all man-made.
>Some things are objectively right and some things are objectively wrong
there are too many different conflicting moral systems to believe that this is really true. Aztecs thought it was morally good to cut people's hearts out and eat them, Canaanites thought it was morally good to burn their own newborn babies to death, current year britbongs just voted to also make it legal to kill babies, Indians right now think rape and cannibalism is ok and that eating cow shit is sacred, muslims think cutting off their daughters clitoruses is a moral imperative, jews think everybody else doesn't even count as a human being and that eating foreskins is cool, Christians think their personal responsibility can be taken away by a guy getting tortured to death and metaphorically feasting on his flesh and blood and on it goes. Even theft isn't something all humans agree is morally wrong.
People used to believe that all humans are the same and innately have the same morals and then they discovered other groups of people that radically different who really don't have the same morals as them. Liberalism was an extropolation of the belief that all people are the same with the same basic morality (this was borne out of Christianity 'all men made in God's image') (incorrect) and current progressivism is a warped further extrapolated version of this (with Marxist dialectic/historical analysis cobbled onto it) attempting to enforce an objective morality on everyone based around power/oppression dynamics (retarded). This is what is destroying the west.
The west is being destroyed by too much empathy and morality is a spook.
>>101351191
skill issue
based libertarian spotted
>>101330187
it's not moral relativism destroying the west, it's progressivism which is a strict concrete ideology with its own stated rigid worldview and prescriptive morals. Moral relativism is just the belief/observation that there is no proven objective morality and that competing different moral systems exist that are all man-made.
>Some things are objectively right and some things are objectively wrong
there are too many different conflicting moral systems to believe that this is really true. Aztecs thought it was morally good to cut people's hearts out and eat them, Canaanites thought it was morally good to burn their own newborn babies to death, current year britbongs just voted to also make it legal to kill babies, Indians right now think rape and cannibalism is ok and that eating cow shit is sacred, muslims think cutting off their daughters clitoruses is a moral imperative, jews think everybody else doesn't even count as a human being and that eating foreskins is cool, Christians think their personal responsibility can be taken away by a guy getting tortured to death and metaphorically feasting on his flesh and blood and on it goes. Even theft isn't something all humans agree is morally wrong.
People used to believe that all humans are the same and innately have the same morals and then they discovered other groups of people that radically different who really don't have the same morals as them. Liberalism was an extropolation of the belief that all people are the same with the same basic morality (this was borne out of Christianity 'all men made in God's image') (incorrect) and current progressivism is a warped further extrapolated version of this (with Marxist dialectic/historical analysis cobbled onto it) attempting to enforce an objective morality on everyone based around power/oppression dynamics (retarded). This is what is destroying the west.
The west is being destroyed by too much empathy and morality is a spook.
>>101351191
skill issue
Page 1