Search Results
7/17/2025, 5:53:33 PM
>>212863421
Yeah but there's a specific stipulation, you'll see a lot of BMWF mulattas who hate black men and gravitate towards white guys (even something unexpected like racist/conservative type ones) because their dad was absent and the mom was bitter and hateful towards Black men and even their mixed race kid as a result. Doja Cat is a good example. The mom has to seethe and be racist or the self-hating won't work thougbeit.
Yeah but there's a specific stipulation, you'll see a lot of BMWF mulattas who hate black men and gravitate towards white guys (even something unexpected like racist/conservative type ones) because their dad was absent and the mom was bitter and hateful towards Black men and even their mixed race kid as a result. Doja Cat is a good example. The mom has to seethe and be racist or the self-hating won't work thougbeit.
7/12/2025, 1:21:14 AM
I’m gonna settle this debate once and for all.
The overwhelming majority of men are sexually attracted to girls as young 14 or so. Trying to argue against this is just cope, statistics demonstrate it over and over. Now, this doesn’t mean that the age of consent should be 14. People are retards at that age and can’t always meaningfully consent to sex. But it’s more of a gray area rather than it always being right or wrong. Can a 14 year old consent to sex with a 16 year old? Yes. Can a 14 year old consent to sex with a 26 year old? No. But you have to draw the line somewhere. So having an age of consent at like 16 with exceptions if their partner was within a couple of years of age is probably the best system to have.
But discussions about this topic are always disingenuously co-opted by actual pedophiles on this site. They’ll provoke discussions about the gray areas to try and normalize their attraction to actual pre-pubescent children, not 16 year olds. They’re also probably trannies and/or were groomed by anime.
The overwhelming majority of men are sexually attracted to girls as young 14 or so. Trying to argue against this is just cope, statistics demonstrate it over and over. Now, this doesn’t mean that the age of consent should be 14. People are retards at that age and can’t always meaningfully consent to sex. But it’s more of a gray area rather than it always being right or wrong. Can a 14 year old consent to sex with a 16 year old? Yes. Can a 14 year old consent to sex with a 26 year old? No. But you have to draw the line somewhere. So having an age of consent at like 16 with exceptions if their partner was within a couple of years of age is probably the best system to have.
But discussions about this topic are always disingenuously co-opted by actual pedophiles on this site. They’ll provoke discussions about the gray areas to try and normalize their attraction to actual pre-pubescent children, not 16 year olds. They’re also probably trannies and/or were groomed by anime.
6/16/2025, 10:38:25 PM
>>211809041
India's is 76 though SAAR, respect your Kazakh chimp superiors!
India's is 76 though SAAR, respect your Kazakh chimp superiors!
6/13/2025, 11:58:31 AM
Page 1