>>508977717
>We need to talk about Jesus.
Okay.
>We all learned the typical story Old Testament -> New Testament
Testament means "will" and there's no different "will" of God because God doesn't change, he's the same yesterday, today and tomorrow.
>It's fucking wrong. There can't be any connection between Jesus and the jew god,Yahweh.
>
Well, until God himself came to tell it like he is, there was bound to be some misinterpreting.
>There is nothing to learn from the OT besides criminal acts.
>
You can learn what not to do, right?
>The gnostics were probably right. We NEED to reclaim Jesus as the one that came to spread the knowledge to the people,teach good things and free people from evil.
>
The gnosticisim denied the divinity of Jesus, though, didn't it?
>The more you look at it the more it seems that Jesus was probably Greek
I think you mean God.
>His teachings were highjacked and that is why today we have this irrational connection between a god(Yahweh) that kills children and a book(OT) that teaches probably every disgusting act that there has ever been and then we have Jesus,the fairest and kindest man that has ever walked the earth.
>
Well, all of jewish history is essentially jews saying "I'm technically not disobeying," and God saying, "I'm technically not smiting you."
>It's time to get rid of OT. It has nothing to do with Jesus Christ!
The entire historical record, not just from what is called OT scripture but the entire culmination of writing up until the time Christ walked this earth (job 19:25) is prophetic to look forward and testify to the coming of the Creator. Notice I quoted Job, the oldest book that is included in what is considered and called the Old Testament. Without looking for Jesus in the older writings, you will not see him.
You don't really read the Bible without looking for Jesus do you?
I mean, he's God, and the purpose of reading the Bible is to get to know God after all. You wouldn't read someone's blog expecting to find you?