>>42397334
They would do that even if there wasn't that one horsefucker to point to, so there's no reason to care what they think. You need to let it go.

>the shartynigger from earlier is still at it

>In a perfect fandom, conventions would not exist. They ONLY exist for normalfags to show off how much they pretend to like a piece of media to other normalfags.
>implying "perfect" fandoms couldn't exist prior to web 2.0 since you had to meet people irl to share experiences with other fans
>implying perfect fandoms would only ever be vague, empty parasocial interactions with others only allowed to be done digitally

I'm not even giving you a (you) for this shitty take.