>>714852894
>why genetics work on all other animals but not humans and we are all equal and have the same physical and intellectual capabilities?
you're thinking of eugenics and eugenics will never work on humans
putting aside the moral quandaries that these faggots (>>714853160 >>714853438 >>714854379) are trying to make smug passes at,
humans are more prone to the negative effects of inbreeding (which eugenics and non-natural selection causes in "purebred" animals)
the human genome is twice as complex than that of a horse or dog
breeding isn't as simple as "taking all of the 'good' genetics and only breeding them with the same kind of 'good' genetics", on top of the massive fucking pool of recessive genes hiding in the supposed "good ones", gene functions are often tied to one another
humans live way too long to ever efficiently or effectively attempt this morality or no (80 years vs 10-12 and 18-20), you're only deluding yourself if you genuinely believe it would lead to some aryan utopia instead of creating new fucked up varieties of human beings