>>95859637
Yeah, that's my point. If anon wants to argue current aggro is too fast for Oko to keep up, that'd be one thing. I might even agree. But at compare it to the actual cards people played, not to draft chaff in a list you pulled from a 10 second google search. Because it becomes abundantly clear you didn't actually play at that time when your point of reference for aggro back then is cavalcade of calamity, a fucking meme budget deck.