>>510144135
I knew this happened from the start.
Everybody was saying the RAT was deployed and that the plane had malfunctioned and I was saying it was either pilot choice or error or maintenance error.
>“Why did you cutoff?” The other responds, “I did not do so.” This exchange shows that the fuel supply was turned off, but no one in the cockpit claims to have done it.
One of the pilots was likely sick of life and felt like taking everybody else out. Of course he’s going to be a coward and claim to have not done so in their last moments.
If he did admit to it, he would’ve had to see the look on the other pilot’s face as he realized he was betrayed. So lying was an easier alternative.

I knew this was a suicide from the start.
Anyone who said the engine “failed” is a retard.

>>507367266
>>507367276
It definitely deployed. fuck
https://youtube.com/shorts/XzQJ73DSkl4
>so what do you think now we know the RAT deployed?
Potentially jeets cheaping out on the maintenance schedule and using foreign parts. Could be catastrophe engine failure. Could still be pilot error but it becomes less likely. Uninterruptible autopilot (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uninterruptible_autopilot) is the worst case scenario but doubt boeing would crash a jeet jet for no reason