>>712730417
>length contraction
Ooooh you fuckwit. Recent studies have shown that it's not what we thought it was. Look up Terrell-Penrose rotation. I'll surmise it by telling you that picture A is what an object at rest looks like, while picture C is what it looks like when passed from the same perspective at near light speed. Objects appear to rotate, which is what accounts for the contraction of lengths.