Search Results
7/22/2025, 1:45:27 PM
>>40774445
>Should have required lead shielding for human to go through and survive.
no it doesn't. just shows that you know nothing about the VAB.
https://www.clavius.org/envradintro.html
>They did it in a craft made of tin-foil
no they didn't. They were in the Command Module, the walls of which were about 5 inches of steel sheet and fibrous insulation, then all the equipment bolted to the walls. im sure you believe that stuff didn't count as 'shielding' because you've no clue about radiation at all.
>Shadows in all of the pictures are obviously from multiple light sources
obviously not since there would be multiple shadows from everything. there isn't. you just get confused by how the angle of shadows look in photographs. vidrel
> people finding letters on moon rocks
no. theres one photo that had a tiny hair included during development
>The hashmarks sometimes go behind objects when they shouldn'
only when there was a bright object behind it. thats just how things work in photography - very fine details can be lost in bright areas of contrast.
>The Earth was discovered to be photoshopped into the picture taken from the moon
which one?
>They refused to give live feeds to the TV networks and forced them to film the projector at mission control.
when?
>delay
is absolutely fine. you're just looking at an edited network video.
>They fucked up and sent footage from Apollo 11 to a film maker.
no they didn't. Sibrel lied, saying he had secret footage never before seen, when in reality it had been broadcast live on TV.
https://www.moonhoaxdebunked.com/2017/07/611-did-astronauts-fake-tv-footage-of.html
so, as with almost everyone else who thinks the landings were fake, all you've got are a bunch of tired old memes to offer. you know nothing about the subjects they touch upon and have done zero research outside the sources of your dumb misleading talking points.
>Should have required lead shielding for human to go through and survive.
no it doesn't. just shows that you know nothing about the VAB.
https://www.clavius.org/envradintro.html
>They did it in a craft made of tin-foil
no they didn't. They were in the Command Module, the walls of which were about 5 inches of steel sheet and fibrous insulation, then all the equipment bolted to the walls. im sure you believe that stuff didn't count as 'shielding' because you've no clue about radiation at all.
>Shadows in all of the pictures are obviously from multiple light sources
obviously not since there would be multiple shadows from everything. there isn't. you just get confused by how the angle of shadows look in photographs. vidrel
> people finding letters on moon rocks
no. theres one photo that had a tiny hair included during development
>The hashmarks sometimes go behind objects when they shouldn'
only when there was a bright object behind it. thats just how things work in photography - very fine details can be lost in bright areas of contrast.
>The Earth was discovered to be photoshopped into the picture taken from the moon
which one?
>They refused to give live feeds to the TV networks and forced them to film the projector at mission control.
when?
>delay
is absolutely fine. you're just looking at an edited network video.
>They fucked up and sent footage from Apollo 11 to a film maker.
no they didn't. Sibrel lied, saying he had secret footage never before seen, when in reality it had been broadcast live on TV.
https://www.moonhoaxdebunked.com/2017/07/611-did-astronauts-fake-tv-footage-of.html
so, as with almost everyone else who thinks the landings were fake, all you've got are a bunch of tired old memes to offer. you know nothing about the subjects they touch upon and have done zero research outside the sources of your dumb misleading talking points.
6/22/2025, 1:36:51 PM
Take a good look at this webm. its an image often used by moonhoaxies as they try to claim that the shadows in the photos are fake.
Ive never seen a moonhoaxie even bother to construct such models as part of their 'evidence' Perhaps because they know it wont help their arguments.
Ive never seen a moonhoaxie even bother to construct such models as part of their 'evidence' Perhaps because they know it wont help their arguments.
Page 1