Search Results
7/21/2025, 9:25:47 PM
>>510989549
True Claude is best for writing and research tasks btw. Here are some of the prompts I use with it. In case you want to use them.
Source Quality Checkpoint
"I've been collecting sources for [project]. Please review what I have and tell me:
Which sources are strongest for my argument
Where I have gaps that need filling
What sources I'm over-relying on
If I have too many secondary sources and need more primary material
Whether my sources actually support the claims I want to make
Be honest about source weaknesses - I'd rather know now than during peer review."
For Getting Direct Responses About Limitations
Questions to Ask for Transparency
"What sources did you actually find on this?"
"Are you finding different viewpoints or just one perspective?"
"Is this topic getting broad coverage or limited coverage?"
"Are you basing this on actual sources or filling in gaps?"
For Meta-Prompting and Clarity
Constraint Setting
"For this task, please:
Only use information from [sources]
Limit responses to [length/format]
Focus exclusively on [aspects]
Flag any assumptions or gaps
Provide confidence levels for claims"
Direct Communication Style
"Please do not try to appease or mollify me. I want direct, honest responses even if they might seem negative or disappointing. Skip the diplomatic language and just tell me what I need to know."
For Reality Checks and Honest Feedback
No-Validation Mode
"Do not automatically agree with or validate everything I say. If something seems incorrect, delusional, or potentially harmful, tell me directly. I need you to be a reality check, not an echo chamber."
Critical Analysis Request
"Please critically evaluate what I'm saying rather than affirming it. Point out logical flaws, factual errors, or concerning patterns. If my reasoning doesn't make sense, say so clearly."
True Claude is best for writing and research tasks btw. Here are some of the prompts I use with it. In case you want to use them.
Source Quality Checkpoint
"I've been collecting sources for [project]. Please review what I have and tell me:
Which sources are strongest for my argument
Where I have gaps that need filling
What sources I'm over-relying on
If I have too many secondary sources and need more primary material
Whether my sources actually support the claims I want to make
Be honest about source weaknesses - I'd rather know now than during peer review."
For Getting Direct Responses About Limitations
Questions to Ask for Transparency
"What sources did you actually find on this?"
"Are you finding different viewpoints or just one perspective?"
"Is this topic getting broad coverage or limited coverage?"
"Are you basing this on actual sources or filling in gaps?"
For Meta-Prompting and Clarity
Constraint Setting
"For this task, please:
Only use information from [sources]
Limit responses to [length/format]
Focus exclusively on [aspects]
Flag any assumptions or gaps
Provide confidence levels for claims"
Direct Communication Style
"Please do not try to appease or mollify me. I want direct, honest responses even if they might seem negative or disappointing. Skip the diplomatic language and just tell me what I need to know."
For Reality Checks and Honest Feedback
No-Validation Mode
"Do not automatically agree with or validate everything I say. If something seems incorrect, delusional, or potentially harmful, tell me directly. I need you to be a reality check, not an echo chamber."
Critical Analysis Request
"Please critically evaluate what I'm saying rather than affirming it. Point out logical flaws, factual errors, or concerning patterns. If my reasoning doesn't make sense, say so clearly."
Page 1