>>17832888
You would have not be making a contradiction nor accepting contradictions are true or are worthwhile though
>Not binary
They are false and true otherwise it wouldn't be a contradiction, also, through logic, not anti logic. You can't use false statements to reach the truth without knowing the truth beforehand, the dialectic is pretty much worthless as a method of reaching truth. Also
>irrational elements
please define these, I'm genuinely curious
>Ontologically problematic
Your generalization works on such things as your given example, since your sample size is rather small and generalization simple. You still can't get into people's heads, and I'm getting too tired to think of a situation. Feel free to dig in to this opening while i play vidya
It might be that i will have to concede this point to the extent that your proles as a group being t, and it unfortunately might fail in the premise and society part, as it's being used instead of the term lower class which has no ontological argument for a revolution.
I would apologize to Jesus, Hoppe and Mises for this failing if I were to be fully convinced, likely after reread this post tomorrow, good day commie-kun
>Let me patronize you on your religion
No