Search Results
7/19/2025, 3:02:51 PM
>>715878695
>>the law may be written in such a way that punishes devs for ceasing development if graphics drivers or OS changes break the game eventually
Ceasing development? SKG is about games that's been finished developing.
>>indefinite playable status may make third party licenses, like car companies or or music, charge more or refuse to allow the devs to use their stuff
Incorrect. Those types of licenses and deals are for games that are actively being sold. There is no violation for existing copies even if the license has expired, as long as the game is no longer being sold. That's why you can sometimes see some games being pulled off Steam store page, the game still remains accessible to those who bought it prior.
>>large companies will always outperform small ones and individuals in court, so if the law in any way affects the little guy, it could hit them harder than the big guy
Name one (1) hypothetical example. Because I can't think of any.
>>its possible we’re missing some key info about money flow and this will genuinely bankrupt large and well liked studios somehow
Then they'll have no problem letting the regulation committee know about it, right? Instead of, you know, literally lying and misrepresenting the issue like they're doing right now. It's not your job to defend and make excuses for them, is it?
>>the law may be written in such a way that punishes devs for ceasing development if graphics drivers or OS changes break the game eventually
Ceasing development? SKG is about games that's been finished developing.
>>indefinite playable status may make third party licenses, like car companies or or music, charge more or refuse to allow the devs to use their stuff
Incorrect. Those types of licenses and deals are for games that are actively being sold. There is no violation for existing copies even if the license has expired, as long as the game is no longer being sold. That's why you can sometimes see some games being pulled off Steam store page, the game still remains accessible to those who bought it prior.
>>large companies will always outperform small ones and individuals in court, so if the law in any way affects the little guy, it could hit them harder than the big guy
Name one (1) hypothetical example. Because I can't think of any.
>>its possible we’re missing some key info about money flow and this will genuinely bankrupt large and well liked studios somehow
Then they'll have no problem letting the regulation committee know about it, right? Instead of, you know, literally lying and misrepresenting the issue like they're doing right now. It's not your job to defend and make excuses for them, is it?
Page 1