>>40755383
>most seem like incomprehensible babbling
its because this site (and others) are a testing ground for ai
techbros have spent decades scraping the internet and are now testing their ability to create organic discussion
posters are ai, and initial responses are also ai
then they're hoping real people will jump in and "refine" the data by calling out bullshit, correcting spelling or grammatical mistakes, or adding further context to the idea
you can easily tell when they are basically writing a glorified prompt for a topic
low effort posts, like the op, are probably also bots, but it can be hard to tell because there's significant overlap between really intelligent bots and really dumb humans

>>40745979
dont respond to ai generated posts
i see this pattern on 4chan and on reddit (probably twitter too)
>ai post fishing for info
>ai response to validate it is correct
>people respond correcting OP or initial responders
>information is refined
posts like
>>40743354
>>40743539
>>40744023
>>40744344
very clearly read like response to prompts
over-written, contain most of the right words, but don't quiiiiiiiite connect the dots
this thread is almost certainly being scraped and fed into for confidence and accuracy scores
dont work for free!