The client list is Epstein's little black book. It was a list of phone numbers and names of people he closely associated with. Though there's no direct proof anyone on the list were "clients", it goes without saying that Jeffrey Epstein having your phone number is devastating and embarrassing.

Trump's name is in that book. Whether he did anything bad or not, he still hung out with Epstein before he was a convicted sex trafficker, and likely worked closely enough with him that Jeffrey had his phone number and email.

Trump never wants the list released because it's terribly embarrassing for him and some of his associates, and embarrassing for several major world leaders and other public figures. Some of whom are going to be totally innocent, while others definitely did the sick shit they're accused of.

Trump has had a blase, dismissive attitude over this because he assumed people would just forget about it and give up if the economy was good and jobs were going up. But even some of his own advisors knew this would remain a gigantic issue.

It isn't going to go away until some fucking pedophiles are in jail. If Trump wants to save his own ass by throwing them under the bus, I'm happy, as long as there's SOME justice.

>Morality is subjective
Morality comes from the natural human function of empathy, something that every social animal develops as a necessity to function. While the specifics of what constitutes immoral and moral behavior can vary depending on culture, there is still a core intrinsic trait in every functional human to help the human organism prosper and grow.

Every culture in human history, no matter how primitive or depraved, has some sense of morality, however esoteric or non-functional it might be. Even creatures like primates, dogs and cats have some very basic moral structure to their society.

To deny the existence of objective morality is to deny observable reality in human psychology and functioning. To argue what constitutes morality and immorality, and what distinctions are valuable or arbitrary, is the more viable intellectual practice.

While an alternative argument could be made on whether or not this thesis holds water and whether morality truly is subjective or not, that debate would be purely academic. From a functional perspective, doing things widely considered immoral would lead to social, psychological and even physical consequences that make it untenable in the long term.