Search Results
6/6/2025, 3:22:17 PM
>>2791561
The land would be insanely expensive. Imagine if you owned a small 100sqm building and your building was the one thing stopping Disney from building a theme park (and it would take years for them to try and force a sale in the courts).
This is their current proposal for Disney Forward. They presented this as expansions for both Disneyland and California Adventure, both parks would be linked to the expansion through large bridges. The current downtown Disney area would be moved to a larger site. The plans make it seem like there's a huge amount of space, but it's got both of the hotels in the middle that eat up a load of it and generally make it difficult for it to be a single park.
The best option seems to be what they're doing, create as big of a block of land as possible for a third gate (even if they have to have a bunch of bridges and some weird bottlenecked parts) and move all the parking to any parcel of land they're able to buy.
The land would be insanely expensive. Imagine if you owned a small 100sqm building and your building was the one thing stopping Disney from building a theme park (and it would take years for them to try and force a sale in the courts).
This is their current proposal for Disney Forward. They presented this as expansions for both Disneyland and California Adventure, both parks would be linked to the expansion through large bridges. The current downtown Disney area would be moved to a larger site. The plans make it seem like there's a huge amount of space, but it's got both of the hotels in the middle that eat up a load of it and generally make it difficult for it to be a single park.
The best option seems to be what they're doing, create as big of a block of land as possible for a third gate (even if they have to have a bunch of bridges and some weird bottlenecked parts) and move all the parking to any parcel of land they're able to buy.
Page 1