Search Results
7/21/2025, 2:11:22 PM
>>16730082
>1: no such thing as a point source
That's one of the examples of singularities in various theories which get resolved by treating things as not point sources. It's not the only type of singularity however, as I showed with the fluid example.
>2: errors are acknowledged, with specification that common use is not impacted(that's odd, why is this treated differently?)
You need to couple it with the first answer which shows that this is not treated differently and is the case for all of physics.
>3: Nothing here should have been typed.
Wrong. As it answers the question.
>4. Ditto
>5. There is no core.
See pic for the current models.
>6. More like bound by the speed of sound. It's a fucking fluid
I meant that it's bound by the speed of light in the same way that the speed of sound is bound by the speed of light. This kind of does become relevant because the speed of sound in these environments is relativistic according to current models.
>1: no such thing as a point source
That's one of the examples of singularities in various theories which get resolved by treating things as not point sources. It's not the only type of singularity however, as I showed with the fluid example.
>2: errors are acknowledged, with specification that common use is not impacted(that's odd, why is this treated differently?)
You need to couple it with the first answer which shows that this is not treated differently and is the case for all of physics.
>3: Nothing here should have been typed.
Wrong. As it answers the question.
>4. Ditto
>5. There is no core.
See pic for the current models.
>6. More like bound by the speed of sound. It's a fucking fluid
I meant that it's bound by the speed of light in the same way that the speed of sound is bound by the speed of light. This kind of does become relevant because the speed of sound in these environments is relativistic according to current models.
Page 1