>>63893993
Imagine if you will for a second, some anonymous person on the internet feeling the need to defend a company they have no ties to, to a bunch of other anonymous people on the internet. Now imagine that person defending the companies honor is having to point out said company won on appeal. Why did there need to be a court case in the first place? It is strange no other gun company is having large swaths of court cases for their firearms seemingly just going off for no reason at all. Does that not strike you as odd at all?

>>527877121
t-take it back... it has to be... i...