Search Results
7/9/2025, 6:48:13 AM
>>11484245
>4H shill born in 1999 needing to lie about the history of some toy because he doesn't want to acknowledge the actual criticism about 4H not being able fix brittle plastic issues 10 years later
You realize reviews still exist for the original troll and no one mentions it has issues? Again, it took a while for the issues to pop up, not weeks like you're lying. I'm old and i never saw the issues, despite the troll being such a shelf warmer that it actually co-existed with the Two Towers troll later on.
I only found out about the rubber issue around that time, since i asked someone on a forum if the armored troll was worth it. So i skipped him and completely forgot about the line by the time the superior Battle Troll came out. Again, Toy Biz was able to react to the issue like a good toy company does, hence the Battle troll still holding up to this day.... unlike 4H's mythic legion figures, which continue being prone to snapping
But what's this ahve to do with the original point, which is that 4H uses rotocasting, one of the cheapest ways of producing toys, but charging for it like it's high pressure injection molding?
Does 4H have a good reason to charge as much for the dragon or is it just 4H expecting fanboys to bend over for their pricing, because they don't know how cheap rotocasting is?
>4H shill born in 1999 needing to lie about the history of some toy because he doesn't want to acknowledge the actual criticism about 4H not being able fix brittle plastic issues 10 years later
You realize reviews still exist for the original troll and no one mentions it has issues? Again, it took a while for the issues to pop up, not weeks like you're lying. I'm old and i never saw the issues, despite the troll being such a shelf warmer that it actually co-existed with the Two Towers troll later on.
I only found out about the rubber issue around that time, since i asked someone on a forum if the armored troll was worth it. So i skipped him and completely forgot about the line by the time the superior Battle Troll came out. Again, Toy Biz was able to react to the issue like a good toy company does, hence the Battle troll still holding up to this day.... unlike 4H's mythic legion figures, which continue being prone to snapping
But what's this ahve to do with the original point, which is that 4H uses rotocasting, one of the cheapest ways of producing toys, but charging for it like it's high pressure injection molding?
Does 4H have a good reason to charge as much for the dragon or is it just 4H expecting fanboys to bend over for their pricing, because they don't know how cheap rotocasting is?
Page 1