Search Results
7/6/2025, 9:43:35 AM
>>63946466
>>63946450
>>63946394
I would much rather use the antimatter as a way to produce more conventional weapons (or better ones) using the antimatter as a power source.
Presumably antimatter would have much more energy potential than even nuclear power, and it may even be stored and moved in a ready-to-use state unlike (most) nuclear power sources. With enough energy, you could make more weapons, better weapons, or probably both. Not to mention it would be useful for funding further research into harvesting antimatter, wasting it as a weapon would be stupid.
That is unless there is a practically massive supply of antimatter (similar to nuclear weapons, or the materials to make them).
>>63946450
>>63946394
I would much rather use the antimatter as a way to produce more conventional weapons (or better ones) using the antimatter as a power source.
Presumably antimatter would have much more energy potential than even nuclear power, and it may even be stored and moved in a ready-to-use state unlike (most) nuclear power sources. With enough energy, you could make more weapons, better weapons, or probably both. Not to mention it would be useful for funding further research into harvesting antimatter, wasting it as a weapon would be stupid.
That is unless there is a practically massive supply of antimatter (similar to nuclear weapons, or the materials to make them).
Page 1