>>96057661
>This would be a good criticism if Dolmenwood was generic, but having read only Dolmenwood, it's clearly not generic (I mean, beyond the extent to which all fantasy-themed D&D-based games are).
Alright, now we're getting somewhere. Let's see if we can leverage open that tiny little brain pan of yours and open you up to the possibility of you not just being wrong but fucking retarded.

Dolmenwood, by your own words, is better for being unique apart from all those little D&Disms that are in there, right?
What if it was more unique and less D&Disms? Would that be better again?
Yes? Good.
Now take those two points, build an extrapolation line and fuck off up it until you reach the natural conclusion.
>B-b-but it good
Yeah and it could've been great only to drill through its own kneecaps after taking everyone's dime.
But keep being more bothered about me being annoyed than the situation itself. Retard.