>>106216505
>so if Im usually in a dim/dark environment QD is still the best? not as bright as WOLED but has issues with the QD layer picking up ambient light.
Correct. LG sort of cheats with their separate white subpixel to juice their nit numbers, but in real content with additive RGB/CMY color is more fluorescent and pops more thanks to the saturation levels and their interaction with the human called the Helmholtz–Kohlrausch effect.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmholtz%E2%80%93Kohlrausch_effect
https://tftcentral.co.uk/articles/exploring-oled-brightness-improvements-woled-vs-qd-oled-and-the-need-for-new-metrics-and-specs

The first Tandem OLED monitor review out of China was posted a week ago (turn on CC-translated Subs):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kbAzQGvsA0
It's not the silver bullet we were all hoping it to be (personally I think it's a half-measure until they can ditch the White Subpixel and full RGB but that might not happen until they can get a Blue OLED material that will live for a reasonable amount of time).

You can also see a color brightness breakdown the latest 2025 WOLED & QD-OLED flagships whose panel tech gets repurposed for monitors here:
https://www.rtings.com/tv/tools/compare/lg-g5-oled-vs-samsung-s95f-oled/88601/88596#test_620
WOLED has the edge in white but even the new tandem panel the G5 uses still loses to QD-OLED of the S95F in literally every other color.
Also though it isn't mentioned enough, LG's WOLEDs have worse panel uniformity for some reason.