Search Results
7/1/2025, 4:01:40 AM
>>714131830
"Twink" isn't even a slur. This is just "I can ban you for using plain english that I, personally, don't like". It would be identical to banning over saying you voted for a politician or ate a certain brand of cereal.
Fuck all of this corpo nanny bullshit, corporations don't get a right to govern what I say.
"Twink" isn't even a slur. This is just "I can ban you for using plain english that I, personally, don't like". It would be identical to banning over saying you voted for a politician or ate a certain brand of cereal.
Fuck all of this corpo nanny bullshit, corporations don't get a right to govern what I say.
6/15/2025, 11:20:24 PM
>>712757903
>It's not the same author, anon.
..Yes anon, that's my point. Your entire thread, the entire thing you're insisting the whole time has been "THIS IS WHAT CHUDS ACTUALLY BELIEVE" but multiple of these authors aren't even chuds and the others aren't even contributors. They're just making up headcanon what they think other people believe.
You fell for a transparent parody, like falling for a hard drive article, and are now upset you're the only person who didn't notice. Chill.
>It's not the same author, anon.
..Yes anon, that's my point. Your entire thread, the entire thing you're insisting the whole time has been "THIS IS WHAT CHUDS ACTUALLY BELIEVE" but multiple of these authors aren't even chuds and the others aren't even contributors. They're just making up headcanon what they think other people believe.
You fell for a transparent parody, like falling for a hard drive article, and are now upset you're the only person who didn't notice. Chill.
Page 1