Search Results

Found 2 results for "5a4a1ae32d4000cc873cb1dd40276b93" across all boards searching md5.

Anonymous ID: A6FtYMBp/biz/60690807#60691673
7/26/2025, 12:29:48 AM
>>60691240
>But a core tenant of capitalism is that you can create growth through invention and efficiency.
Hurr durr, it doesn't matter that banking is literally legalised fraud and capitalism is a scam reliant on banking (fraud) being legal because hardworking smart 3rd party people who are not party to the bank "loan" (actually credit) contract will increase real productivity to compensate for the inflation caused by the bank loan so that makes it fine that banking is legalised fraud.
Except it's impossible for real productivity to rise fast enough to do this.
>If you think the invention and dissemination of industrial assets should have zero impact on a currency then I don’t think there’s anything that can convince you capitalism was/is ever needed.
I think you're kike who tries to argue that 3rd parties pulling more than their fair share of the weight means you are allowed to legally commit fraud (banking) to compensate for their excess productivity.
>Just say exponential
It's geometric, not exponential.
>Yes, this is correct and is the basis for modern monetary policy.
Banking is legalised fraud.
>As it stands yes.
As it will continue to stand under capitalism.
>Business borrows more money and makes more money, corporate bonds dwarf any sort of private debt.
Doesn't change the fact that banking is legalised fraud.
>This is due to credit essentially, businesses can borrow money in ways individuals could never. Borrowing money is essential to making money in the modern system. Yes asymmetrical flows of money exist and are structural in economics, John Keynes figured this out a hundred years ago which is why governments use the debt based system they do today.
Funny. You think this statement changes the fact that banking is legalised fraud and capitalism is a jewish scam?
Anonymous ID: bIhVpmlsRomania /pol/509836281#509844501
7/8/2025, 7:01:22 PM
>>509843377
>Define "capitalism" first and we can have a discourse.
Already have, in this very bread.
A for-financial-profit-operated economy. Or society even.
If you take a few minutes to actually think about this, you'll see that all of the other traits, properties, aspects and facets of capitalism implicitly and intrinsically arise as natural consequences of this definition.
Next question.