Search Results
6/10/2025, 9:37:28 PM
>>40506821
>attempting to use escape velocity for the umpteenth time
Already addressed this many times itt and all of the previous threads linked in the OP. See:
>>40505775
>>40506669
Continuing to regurgitate your religious dogma instead of providing actual evidence of your claims is only further confirmation of your religious fanaticism.
>No, it just follows from the premises.
>This follows from the premises also.
XD
>we know gas molecules must reach escape velocity in order to escape into the vacuum of space bc gravity claims that it will prevent gas molecules from reaching escape velocity to prevent them from escaping into the vacuum of space.
Picrel. That’s literally the very definition of a begging the question fallacy. You can’t assume gravity’s effect on gas molecules as proof of gravity’s affect on gas molecules. That’s textbook petitio principii, circular logic.
>attempting to use escape velocity for the umpteenth time
Already addressed this many times itt and all of the previous threads linked in the OP. See:
>>40505775
>>40506669
Continuing to regurgitate your religious dogma instead of providing actual evidence of your claims is only further confirmation of your religious fanaticism.
>No, it just follows from the premises.
>This follows from the premises also.
XD
>we know gas molecules must reach escape velocity in order to escape into the vacuum of space bc gravity claims that it will prevent gas molecules from reaching escape velocity to prevent them from escaping into the vacuum of space.
Picrel. That’s literally the very definition of a begging the question fallacy. You can’t assume gravity’s effect on gas molecules as proof of gravity’s affect on gas molecules. That’s textbook petitio principii, circular logic.
Page 1