Search Results
7/9/2025, 12:50:19 AM
>>17826177
I'm aware of the ending to mark. But that doesn't change OP's claim.
And your claim relies on Mark being the first gospel, which is an unprovable hypothesis with just as much evidence as an Aramaic proto-gospel from Matthew.
We also have manuscript copies of Matthew that date farther back than the first time the ending of Mark is introduced.
>>17826179
>It's about the Bible as a whole
thats why I'm confused.
How do you read the entire old testament and get an understanding of the prophecies, then read the new testament, and take away that Jesus wasn't God?
I'm aware of the ending to mark. But that doesn't change OP's claim.
And your claim relies on Mark being the first gospel, which is an unprovable hypothesis with just as much evidence as an Aramaic proto-gospel from Matthew.
We also have manuscript copies of Matthew that date farther back than the first time the ending of Mark is introduced.
>>17826179
>It's about the Bible as a whole
thats why I'm confused.
How do you read the entire old testament and get an understanding of the prophecies, then read the new testament, and take away that Jesus wasn't God?
Page 1