Search Results
6/21/2025, 12:08:54 PM
>>11463861
Sure, but from what I gather from designer interviews, studios give LEGO notes on what they can and can't do to avoid spoilers for the film. However, in the end, LEGO decides which sets they want to produce. For example, Disney/Lucasfilm told LEGO they should produce a set like pic related for Rogue One, but LEGO decided not to because they wanted to do Krennic's shuttle—a vehicle that barely appears in the film. Meanwhile, pic related had a substantial role in the film. In the end, LEGO makes the final decision on which sets they will produce based on what studios give them. Also, most of the time, the reference material is concept art, which is why the sets often look different from the final products in movie tie-ins.
Also, LEGO will decide if a movie or show is worth it to receive sets based on interest and franchise fatigue, which is why we don't have any Superman movie tie in sets yet, because Zack Snyder killed the DC brand for a good period of time.
Sure, but from what I gather from designer interviews, studios give LEGO notes on what they can and can't do to avoid spoilers for the film. However, in the end, LEGO decides which sets they want to produce. For example, Disney/Lucasfilm told LEGO they should produce a set like pic related for Rogue One, but LEGO decided not to because they wanted to do Krennic's shuttle—a vehicle that barely appears in the film. Meanwhile, pic related had a substantial role in the film. In the end, LEGO makes the final decision on which sets they will produce based on what studios give them. Also, most of the time, the reference material is concept art, which is why the sets often look different from the final products in movie tie-ins.
Also, LEGO will decide if a movie or show is worth it to receive sets based on interest and franchise fatigue, which is why we don't have any Superman movie tie in sets yet, because Zack Snyder killed the DC brand for a good period of time.
Page 1